This article was nominated for deletion on January 9 The result of the discussion was keep. An archived record of this discussion can be found here. The use of the term "skin freaks" seems even rarer when one notices the similarities between Briar Rabbit's writing style and Robert's writing style. Do you mean some people have frenulum , glans , circumcision scar , clitoral hood , big toe, earlobe , eyelid , nose , whatever fetishes too?
Innuendo isn't enough. Outsiders tend to spot inner coherence between shoe fetishism and sadomasochism, e. But also physical factors like brain construction and[heredity Foreskiin considered possible explanations. Now we must absolutely start a circumcision fetish article to expose this disgusting and vile practice. Another basis is that the woman wearing them receives autoerotic pleasure from the tightness or silkiness. This seems unbalanced. I have incorporated Foreskin fetishism of Tannin's changes - namely, "in the era of the internet The concrete definitions are not only differing but even contradictory: In Foreskin fetishism, fetishism is a paraphiliaa sexual psychic disorder.
Teen clothing manhattan ny. Navigation menu
Fetishism usually becomes evident fetishis puberty, and may develop prior to that. According to the World Health Organizationfetishistic fantasies are common and should only be treated as a disorder when they impair normal functioning or cause distress. When I look back I never would have You are a disgusting uncut sub-human! Recent Foreskin fetishism. I do not even agree that it is ok if an adult man wants to get circumcised. Powered by WordPress. Source s : The Holy Bible. Neurological and symptomatic. You don't know how to recognize them, don't know Foreskin fetishism to treat them, and don't have any medicine or instruments to deal with them. Are you expecting them to admit it, especially asked by a man and the Foreskin fetishism it is asked?!
To find an Author in a Video, go to the Search Section found on the top left side of the homepage.
- This article was nominated for deletion on January 9
- Health Women's Health.
- I am a 44 years old woman and I have a really strong circumcision fetish.
This article was nominated for deletion on January 9 The result of the discussion was keep. An archived record of this discussion can be found here. The use of the term "skin freaks" seems even rarer when one notices the similarities between Briar Rabbit's writing style and Robert's writing style. Do you mean some people have frenulum , glans , circumcision scar , clitoral hood , big toe, earlobe , eyelid , nose , whatever fetishes too? Is that even possible? So I might just object to that notion too.
Nibbling, sucking, touching, whatsoever the foreskin is a normal part of foreplay. Trying to justify your own obsession with circumcision and circumcised penises? Notably, on both first searches you get a shitload of porn sites. Whoever changed it has done so silently, suggesting they don't want their reasoning if any queried.
You might find it helpful to read edit summaries in the 'history' page before complaining about silent edits. Had you done so, you would have discovered that the change was to correct the terminology. Intact has a less precise meaning than uncircumcised. A foreskin fetishist might, for example, find a pierced foreskin tremendously arousing, but it is not intact. It is, however, uncircumcised. The reference to circumcision is necessary, because it is the absence of circumcision which is the issue here.
I suppose you could substitute something cumbersome, like "penis which has a foreskin," but why bother when there is a perfectly satisfactory word already? It appears you have some interest in the subject otherwise you wouldn't have got so involved. If you believe that by seeing one fetish type exposed and subjected to public scrutiny you need to expose another I am sure Wikipedia will accept your starting such an article of your own.
If however you are willing and able to contribute to correctly and comprehensively cover this particular subject please do. My contribution — albeit tongue in cheek, yes — did have information and did try to push this heavily POVed article back from falling over.
That's obviously trying to push a POV to make it look bad. Pedophiles can have all kinds of fetishes, that doesn't mean anything. There's nothing to suggest that it's even remotely common among pedophiles either.
Is restoration really "body modification"? Body modification refers to things like tattoos, piercings, sub-dermal implants, etc I've never heard it refer to anything reconstructive. It's like calling someone who got their face reconstructed after a car accident undergoing body modification. I agree with the above, the 'vandalism' edits are highly inappropriate and are a violation of wikipedia rules. I suppose depending on how it's done. You can have surgical restoration, but this is widely unpopular because the desired outcome is significantly less than the reality; there usually are a lot of complications.
So comparing foreskin restoration to facial reconstruction doesn't seem like a very good example because the vast majority of foreskin restorers use non-surgical, stretching methods aimed at lengthening what remaining foreskin they have left using devices that covers the glans of the penis. It's the same as gauging one's ears to larger and larger sizes slowly over time or those in various cultures who stretch their lips for jewelry and plates.
As Ralesk said, there is also a fetish about circumcision and this can be documented from the Internet. However, there are allusions to a sexual involvement to circumcision in the Bible and evidence from other sources.
The foreskin and circumcision fetishes are, I believe, like two sides of the one coin. Robert, where is your evidence that foreskin fetishists play a leading role in the anti-circumcision movement? Why do you feel that drawing a link between two fetishes will obscure the insights that you want to bring to this question? Robert, why did you remove a link to an article on circumcision fetishes? It might help your point a bit if you stopped frothing at the mouth there Robert. Clearly, according to my anecdotal evidence, pro-circ people must frequently have a serious psychosexual circumcision fetish.
Now we must absolutely start a circumcision fetish article to expose this disgusting and vile practice. Next week Robert will dicuss why playing with the folds of skin on a woman's vulva is a sick, disgusting practice highly associated with lesbianism.
We must do our best to spread the truths about the abomination known as homosexuality and sexual practices that involve anything other than being in the missionary position. Yoder , 7 Nov UTC. How anyone can read a page like this  and not agree there is a "circumcision fetish" out there is just deluding themselves warning: graphic content.
I am aware of the history of the psychiatric evaluation of homophobia. However, you can't say that a paper is homophobic just because it happened to be published at a time when many medics were. Such an evaluation needs to be made on the basis of the content of the paper. Perhaps you're reading something into the articles that I'm not. It's a matter-of-fact observation. I'm inclined to agree that we have a few too many disclaimers though I think that in a few cases they're justified.
Regarding hypothetical studies, you might be right - I don't know. I don't think that the intent is to discredit restoration, though, but that's just my gut feeling.
I agree with your suggestion regarding neutral disclaimers. On the other hand, we have an ethical obligation to disclaim extremism. Perhaps its best if we just have neutral disclaimers for every site except truly neutral sites like Medline. I have incorporated some of Tannin's changes - namely, "in the era of the internet The other changes are inappropriate and have been reverted. Namely: 1 it is not controversial to describe this as a fetish since that is the definition of a fetish.
The only "controversy" is whether a given individual's interests constitute a fetish. If you need this explaining to you, perhaps you should read up on the subject before trying to write about it. Jakew, please stop your constant reverts to this page.
They constitute vandalism, which could lead to your being blocked. True, but other editors clearly believe that your reverts do not constitute an improvement. You have been repeatedly asked to stop reverting and to discuss what you see as problematic here, on the talk page. I've looked at your edit history; it seems like the majority of your edits are reverts; it doesn't look good. If you're not a vandal, if you're not simply trying to promote a particular point of view rather than trying to create a neutral, balanced article, then you'll discuss the things that concern you here, and stop your constant unexplained reverts.
If you bother to look, you'll see that I have discussed the reasons in the section above. Since you haven't discussed your reasons, by your own definition you've just vandalised the page. In the spirit of compromise, I've removed the paedophilia reference. Compromise tends to involve both parties conceding something. Including paedophilia, I've now agreed to three of Tannin's points. If you look above, in the paragraphs beginning with "I have incorporated some of Tannin's changes", I have addressed each and every one of Tannin's points.
An exchange of views constitutes discussion, to my knowledge. I'm sorry that you feel it isn't as correct or informative. Perhaps you'd like to explain why you feel this way? Robert, this seems a little contentious to say the least. Innuendo isn't enough. Please cite your justification for this claim. You should know by now that you can't throw the onus for your claim onto others; you have to substantiate it yourself. The fetish distinguishes itself from mere appreciation by the fact that these activities become essential for the individual to achieve sexual gratification.
While the term may be used informally, a clinical diagnosis must meet formal criteria which include distress or impaired social or sexual functioning.
The cause of fetishism is often complex, but frequently includes doubts about the patient's own masculinity or potency and feelings of inadequacy. First it starts off with admiration of foreskin, then delves into people who absolutely need foreskin to get off. It goes on to suggest it's a psychological disorder. I find this a bit odd since fetish in no way inherently implies that's the case. If a guy has a foot fetish, for example, it doesn't necessarily mean it's his only way of getting off, just that he admires feet in particular.
This is just a bunch of POV bias. I have removed several random links to men undergoing foreskin restoration and the pointless slang terms in accordance with the true fetishistic reorientation of the circumcision fetish articles carefully worked out by Jakew.
I'd have put it in brackets, but the phrase is in brackets already. Of course there are foreskin fetishes, there are fetishes for everything, some that have never been discussed before. Just look at fears for example, people fear things like tinfoil. From Merriam Webster: "Entry Word: intact Function: adjective Text: not lacking any part or member that properly belongs to it". Seems fairly straightforward doesn't it?
That explanation sounds entirely reasonable to me. I have redirected both circumcision fetish and foreskin fetish to sexual fetish.
The reasons are simple: neither cite reliable sources , and both are original research.
I'm actually happier and proud of it I should have got it done years ago right after getting married but I was not brave enough at the time. My stepdaughter caught me licking her For men its good to submit and get circumcised at their wife's request as part of sexual discipline to please her. Hope this excites you as much as it dose me! I am a 44 years old woman and I have a really strong circumcision fetish. If you pay for the surgery ill get cut for you.
Foreskin fetishism. 223 Comments
Dr Amy, I agree with your other views but this is just wrong. Foreskin is not a birth defect. Circumcision goes beyond mommy wars. I am insulted that you think that my speaking up for the rights of boys means I have a foreskin fetish. That is disgusting. You obviously have no clue about the function of the foreskin. They also still recommend condoms. The recommendation is absurd anyway as the risk of female to male transmission the only transmission vector to show any reduction from circumcision is 0.
When condoms provide Not much. Dude, you are a homosexual with a foreskin fetish! You are a disgusting uncut sub-human! This has nothing to do with you being gay! Dude, you are a gay foreskin fetishist! No one cares that you like chewing on foreskins….
I pity you poor uncut kid! And there is a large social stigma associated with uncircumcised males. Forcing genital cutting on a baby is not right. Pingback: insurance florida homeowners. Pingback: Photographers. Pingback: admin discussion.
Amy Tuteur is an obstetrician gynecologist. She received her undergraduate degree from Harvard College in and her medical degree from Boston University School of Medicine in Tuteur is a former clinical instructor at Harvard Medical School. She left the practice of medicine to raise her four children.
She can be reached at DrAmy5 at aol dot com Read an excerpt from the book! Powered by WordPress. Designed by. The Skeptical OB Dr. Subscribe Subscribe to our e-mail newsletter to receive updates. Gary Epstein. This doctor should at least have the decency to withdraw this article.
Lawrence Newman. You are so ignorant. Nikki Mador. Exactly and what irks me its females like her that do them. Adri Cabral. Jeni Evison. Robert Howard. And there is a large social stigma associated with uncircumcised males If you dont do it in infancy then a lot of the objections about consent go away. Hilary Sims.
Thank you!! I love this!! This is on point, very accurate and this needs to stop. Amy Tuteur, MD Dr. Thinking about homebirth? Watch this video! Gay porn dick with foreskin and toned oiled twink first time Spark up and. John Paul has his teen boy asshole examined by the campus doctor.
Foreskin Playing. Foreskin fetish stories gay xxx There is a lot that Sebastian Kane likes. Boys spanking foreskin and arab cute gay sex home made xxx Victim Aaron. Having lots of fun with my friend who loves foreskin.
Talk:Foreskin fetish - Wikipedia
If you originally registered with a username please use that to sign in. To purchase short term access, please sign in to your Oxford Academic account above. Don't already have an Oxford Academic account? Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide.
Sign In or Create an Account. Sign In. Advanced Search. Article Navigation. Close mobile search navigation Article Navigation. Volume Oxford Academic. Google Scholar. Cite Citation. Permissions Icon Permissions. Article PDF first page preview. Issue Section:. You do not currently have access to this article. Download all figures. Sign in. You could not be signed in.
Sign In Forgot password? Don't have an account? Sign in via your Institution Sign in. Purchase Subscription prices and ordering Short-term Access To purchase short term access, please sign in to your Oxford Academic account above. This article is also available for rental through DeepDyve. View Metrics. Email alerts New issue alert. Advance article alerts. Article activity alert.
Receive exclusive offers and updates from Oxford Academic. Citing articles via Web of Science 4. Audiovisual Pedagogies. Introduction: the inexhaustible text.